This text is part of the Weather Preparedness & Resilience Toolbox developed by the YOUROPE Event Safety (YES) Group within YOUROPE’s 3F project (Future-Fit Festivals). It is aimed at everyone involved in planning, building, and operating open-air events. It helps festivals and other outdoor events become truly weather-ready by offering both practical and research-based resources as well as background information on weather and climate. Learn how to design safer and more weather-resilient outdoor events.
Relevance of educating the audience
Educating the audience about weather risks and protective actions is a core control measure for outdoor festivals, not an add‑on to “customer information”.
A weather‑aware audience reduces exposure time, improves compliance with protective actions and stabilises crowd dynamics when conditions deteriorate.
Failures in audience education typically manifest indirectly. Incidents are rarely attributed to “lack of information” in post-event analyses; instead, they appear as crowd management failures, medical overload, delayed evacuations, or non-compliance with safety measures. On closer examination, these outcomes often stem from audiences being unaware of risks, misunderstanding instructions, distrusting messages, or receiving information too late or in the wrong format.
A key conceptual distinction is between information, instruction, and behavioural guidance. Information answers the question “what is happening”; instruction addresses “what you must do now”; behavioural guidance prepares audiences in advance for “how to act if X occurs.”
Effective audience education prioritises the latter, as behaviour under stress is largely determined by prior mental models rather than real-time reasoning.
Another foundational principle is anticipatory framing. Audiences who are informed in advance that weather-related measures may occur (such as programme pauses, temporary sheltering, or controlled evacuation) are significantly more likely to accept and comply with them. Without this framing, the same measures are perceived as arbitrary, excessive, or commercially motivated, undermining trust.
Practitioners must also understand the asymmetry of expertise and attention. Festival audiences vary widely in age, experience, physical condition, and risk tolerance. They operate under sensory overload, alcohol or substance influence, fatigue, and emotional immersion. Audience education must therefore be simple, repetitive, and consistent across channels. Complexity and nuance belong in internal decision-making, not in public messaging.
Audience education is inseparable from credibility. Messages are only effective if the sender is perceived as competent, caring, and authoritative. Inconsistent wording, conflicting sources, or visible hesitation erode this credibility rapidly, especially in weather-related situations where uncertainty is already high.
Poorly educated audiences also amplify misinformation. Social media posts, shouted warnings, or misinterpreted visual cues can spread faster than official messages. Without pre-established trust and clear reference points, official communication struggles to regain control of the narrative, even if technically correct.
Audience education sits at the intersection of risk communication, community engagement, and crowd management for mass gatherings. The goal is not to “warn” in the last minutes before impact, but to build a shared mental model of weather risks, site‑specific vulnerabilities, and expected protective behaviours before and during the event.
Key concepts and terminology with direct operational relevance include:
- Risk communication: Two‑way, trust‑building processes that help people understand risks, decide on protective actions, and maintain a sense of control; not just one‑way announcements.
- Community engagement: Systematic involvement of attendees and stakeholder groups (fan communities, local residents, volunteers) as partners in preparedness and response, including co‑developed messages and channels.
- Protective action guidance: Clear, actionable instructions (“go here, do this, avoid that”) matched to the hazard and to realistic options at the site, rather than vague advice (“be careful”, “stay safe”).
Finally, audience education must be understood as tiered over time: long‑term (shaping expectations about “weather‑safe festivals”), medium‑term (pre‑event campaigns and ticketing information), and short‑term (on‑site and in‑event messaging linked to real‑time monitoring and decisions).
More information
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6553581/
- https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2811/2020/
- https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/resources/ajem-april-2024-facing-the-storm-the-increasing-effect-of-severe-weather-on-mass-gathering-events/
- https://yourope.org/know-how/crowd-management-3-the-people/
- https://www.dtn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/eb_Managing_WxRisk_OutdoorEvents.pdf
- https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/media/10652/ajem-2024-02_19.pdf
- https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hot-weather-advice-mass-gatherings-and-planning-events
- https://climahealth.info/theme/risk-communications/
- https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/mass-gatherings-and-infectious-diseases-considerations-2024
- https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/382356/9789240109148-eng.pdf
- https://www.visualcrossing.com/resources/blog/severe-weather-preparedness-ensuring-public-safety-and-emergency-response/
- https://www.monica-project.eu/portfolio-items/crowd-management-and-communication/
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925004522
- https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/crs-crr/2025_epi-win-massgatherings-managingtheheat-digest_jul9.pdf?sfvrsn=c1a724c0_1
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X19300985
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70080
- https://peasi.com/blog/emergency-weather-warnings-public-safety
