This text is part of the Weather Preparedness & Resilience Toolbox developed by the YOUROPE Event Safety (YES) Group within YOUROPE’s 3F project (Future-Fit Festivals). It is aimed at everyone involved in planning, building, and operating open-air events. It helps festivals and other outdoor events become truly weather-ready by offering both practical and research-based resources as well as background information on weather and climate. Learn how to design safer and more weather-resilient outdoor events.
Weather related Risk Assessment for Open-Air Festivals: Cascading Effects
Cascading effects turn a “simple” weather problem into a complex systems crisis, where one impact triggers another and overall risk grows non‑linearly. For weather risk assessment in events and crowd management, treating hazards as isolated episodes badly underestimates both speed and scale of potential failure.
Cascading effects are chains of secondary and tertiary impacts triggered by an initial hazard, often crossing system boundaries (weather → infrastructure → crowd → health). In contrast to single hazards, these chains can produce outcomes that are greater than the sum of individual effects because vulnerabilities accumulate between stages.
Typical cascading pathways for events
For outdoor events and venues, several recurring cascade logics appear in European case studies and infrastructure analyses. Key examples are:
- Heavy rainfall → flash flooding on access roads → power substation outage → pump and lighting failure on site → stalled evacuation in darkness.
- Storm winds → structural damage to tents/stages → blocked exits and chokepoints → crowd turbulence and falls → delayed medical access due to road disruption.
- Heatwave → dehydration and fainting → medical post overload → transport delays for ambulances due to concurrent regional heat impacts.
Integrating cascades into weather risk assessment
Weather risk assessment for events moves from single‑hazard thinking (“Is there a thunderstorm?”) to system thinking (“What can this thunderstorm start that then breaks other systems?”). An effective assessment routinely covers:
- Multi‑hazard screening: Map which primary hazards are plausible (convective storms, heat, extreme rain, wind, river flooding) and how they can overlap in your region
- Interdependency mapping: Identify critical dependencies for the event: power, water, IT/communications, transport links, medical chain, crowd information systems or off‑site refuges.
- Crowd and site vulnerability: Evaluate how crowd size, composition and layout influence cascade potential: dense zones, single chokepoints, tented structures and low staff training all reduce tolerance to weather-related disruption.
Time, lead times and escalation
Cascading effects unfold on different time scales, which must be reflected in thresholds and procedures. For event operations, three layers are particularly relevant:
- Immediate–short term (minutes to 2 hours): Lightning, downbursts, flash floods and microbursts can force instant stage clearance or site evacuation, with very limited time to manage secondary failures such as power loss or crowd surges.
- Medium term (6–24 hours): Persistent heavy rain, regional river levels and strong winds can gradually degrade access roads, parking areas, drainage, and nearby critical infrastructure, raising cascade risk during the event even if conditions were acceptable at opening.
- Long term (days to seasons): Droughts, heatwaves, or prior storms can “prime” slopes, rivers, forests and grids so that a moderate forecast during your event triggers outsized effects (landslides, infrastructure failures, wildfires).
Tools for practitioners
For crowd managers and event safety officers, managing cascading effects in weather risk assessment benefits from structured tools and routines. Useful elements include:
- Checklists and prompts: Use checklists that explicitly ask: “If this system fails because of weather, what fails next, and what does that do to the crowd?”.
- Scenario‑based planning: Develop multi‑step scenarios such as the examples below
- Scenario 1: Prolonged rain and loss of access
A three‑day camping festival on farmland experiences continuous moderate to heavy rain from day one. Drainage is poor, but no single rain event appears “extreme” on radar. By day two, car parks and access tracks become deep mud; shuttle buses struggle, and trucks resupplying food and fuel are delayed or stuck.
The main arena remains functional, but toilets overflow because waste trucks cannot reach service points, and greywater pools around cables and temporary walkways. Organizers decide to end the festival one day early for hygiene and access reasons, but the muddied routes slow vehicle exit and restrict emergency access.
The cascade: persistent rain → ground saturation → transport and service vehicle failure → sanitation breakdown → health risk and severely extended exit/evacuation times.
- Scenario 2: Heat, crowd health and service overload
A one‑day urban open‑air festival is held on a large paved plaza with limited natural shade. Forecast maximum temperature is 35 °C with high solar radiation and low wind. Crowds gather early at the front‑of‑stage area, where radiant heat from the stage infrastructure and dark paving significantly raises perceived temperature. Water sales points have long queues; some attendees avoid leaving their place near the stage to get water, leading to dehydration, fainting and collapses in dense zones.
Medical teams become concentrated near the main stage, reducing their ability to respond to incidents in peripheral areas such as entrances and food courts.
The cascade: high heat → dehydration and collapses in high‑density zones → medical focus on one hotspot → slower response and rising risk for other incidents across the site.
A robust weather-related risk assessment therefore has to model these chains of impact to identify realistic worst-case scenarios, define meaningful thresholds for intervention, and ensure timely, proportionate control measures.
More information
- https://climate-change.uni-graz.at/de/neuigkeiten/compound-and-cascading-hazards-in-a-changing-climate/
- https://climate.axa/publications/compound-weather-events-climate-change/
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096320300243
- https://www.rug.nl/rudolf-agricola-school/research/risk-crises-and-resilience/h2020-cascading-disasters?lang=en
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772991525000209
- https://d-nb.info/1097628299/34
- https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/25/2591/2025/
- https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/265138/reporting
- https://www.swecogroup.com/topical/climate-action/the-hidden-dangers-of-critical-infrastructure-failures/
- https://www.imk-tro.kit.edu/english/5195_5214.php
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s44304-025-00111-5
- https://theconversation.com/disasters-dont-disappear-when-the-storm-ends-cascading-hazards-from-landslides-to-floods-are-upending-risk-models-259502
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/29768659241304857
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001084
- https://news.iu.edu/live/news/46842-research-on-cascading-natural-disaster-hazards-helps-c
